subject
History, 26.06.2019 12:30 joneskc0629

In the opening sentence, lincoln refers to the founding of the nation “fourscore and seven” - 87 - years earlier. which of the following best explains lincoln’s purpose in this opening? he was observing that the nation had strayed from its original ideals. he wanted to remind people about what the nation’s founding ideals were. he believed it was time to rethink what the founding founders had said.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 21:20
How did the completion of the transcontinental railroad change the lives of american citizens? a-it increased the wealth of all americans and enabled them to travel more.b-it made cross-country travel too expensive for ordinary americans.c-it decreased the safety of americans who moved to settle the plains.d-it shortened travel time between the east and west for all americans.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
What is dussel's profession? a. law b. business c. dentistry fyi: this is based on the story anne franks
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:10
Classify the most significant contributions of the two major indian empires to world culture
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In the opening sentence, lincoln refers to the founding of the nation “fourscore and seven” - 87 - y...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 30.06.2019 21:30
question
English, 30.06.2019 21:30