Why did the mughal emperor recognize the right of the british east india company to collect taxes on in northeast asia?

Because they needed the protection of the East India Company (EIC) to preserve the Mughal authority. After one century of prosperity the Mughal empire was facing its own decline. Different emperors raise to throne and did very little to save the empire from its collapse.

They faced several fights among claimers to the throne and eventually civil war. Much of the Mughal treasures were looted. In response, the British from the EIC gained trading rights, such as collect taxes, and ultimately political power.

Mughal emperor recognizes the right of the British East India Company to collect taxes on northeast Asia because they needed the protection of the East India Company (EIC) to preserve the Mughal authority.

Further Explanations:

East India Company was syndicate of Governor of Great Britain and traders of London Trading association tangled in East Indies. They establishedtheir trade association in India after overpowering the Portuguese and handling concession on trade form Mughals. After fully establishing themselves, they allied with Marathas and other rivals of Mughal, to weaken them and even bribed the generals of the Empire to ruin their administration. Soon they got into the Mughals and hollowed the whole administration.  

Soon Mughals realized that they are on the verge of their declination because of these British. Efforts laid by numerous successors didn’t do well and that resulted in the civil war amid the claimers of the throne. These factors helped East India Company to gain supremacy and levied the authority to collect trading rights, collect taxes and also political supremacy.The company continued its monopoly in India until 1857.

Learn More  

1. In-state court, a losing party can appeal a case if a jury is unable to make a decision. a judge disagrees with a jury’s decision. a precedent does not exist. a higher court agrees to hear it.?

2. How did the decision the Supreme Court reached in Texas v. Johnson affect the protections offered by the first amendment?

3. The impact of Furman v. Georgia (1972) was that states had to promise to use the death penalty only with approval from the Supreme Court. Throw out the old Miranda warning and write a new one. Agree to throw out all state laws regarding crime and impose national standards?

Answer Details-

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: East India Company

Keywords: East India Company,India, East India, Portuguese, Mughals, Governor of Great Britain, London Trading, Marathas, British, trading rights, collect taxes ,political, supremacy

1) the andrew carniage's purchase and renovation of skibo castle have been very good and auspicious for the local people of dornoch firth, scotland because this is a turistic attraction for many people who would want to know the castle, the local people would take advantage about this.

2) yes, it could.