Which pair of statements best compares the roles of martin luther and john calvin in the reformation? martin luther’s criticisms of the catholic church sparked the reformation; john calvin created a new denomination that promoted good works. john calvin’s criticisms of the catholic church sparked the reformation; martin luther created a new denomination that promoted good works. martin luther broke from the catholic church over an annulment; john calvin translated the bible into english and started the church of england. john calvin broke from the catholic church over an annulment; martin luther translated the bible into english and started the church of england.

Firstly, it was Martin Luther's criticisms of the Catholic Church that sparked the reformation, specifically, his 95 Theses. So we can cross out, "John Calvin’s criticisms of the Catholic Church sparked the Reformation; Martin Luther created a new denomination that promoted good works."

Secondly, the Church of England was established by Henry 8th because the Catholic Church would not allow him to be divorced from his first wife. Therefore we can cross out, "Martin Luther broke from the Catholic Church over an annulment; John Calvin translated the Bible into English and started the Church of England." and "John Calvin broke from the Catholic Church over an annulment; Martin Luther translated the Bible into English and started the Church of England."

Therefore, the correct pair of statements is: "Martin Luther’s criticisms of the Catholic Church sparked the Reformation; John Calvin created a new denomination that promoted good works."

Martin Luther’s criticisms of the Catholic Church sparked the Reformation; John Calvin created a new denomination that promoted good works.

can you attach the graph and answer options (:

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.