Which of the following is the best explanation for government regulation of the public utilities market? the isolated location makes it impossible for any other providers of utilities to compete. it is most efficient to allow only one supplier of electricity or water because of economies of scale. providing utilities is not attractive to private companies because of limited opportunities to make a profit. the government wishes to reward the technological innovation of the utilities providers with guarantees of limited competition.

The best explanation for "government regulation" of the public utility market is: "The government wishes to reward the technological innovation of the utility providers with guarantees of limited competition".

Explanation:

The government need be at the focus on regulating utilities belonging to the state while in the market. This is because the resources that are used are basic needs for people. Therefore, it should also regulate its use.

As a company that deals with the specific resources, the government should also monitor the technological innovation by offering them little competition on incentives. This is important to ensure the population receives the best services.

in mcculloch v. maryland (1819) the supreme court ruled that congress had implied powers under the necessary and proper clause of article i, section 8 of the constitution to create the second bank of the united states and that the state of maryland lacked the power to tax the bank.

gibbons v. ogden, (1824), was a landmark decision in which the supreme court of the united states held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to congress by the commerce clause of the united states constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.