Health care costs in the united states are on the rise. some people say that a universal health care system would bring costs down and increase access to care. others say it would be too expensive and would reduce the quality of care. examine editorials from both sides of the argument. then, write a five-paragraph essay in which you compare and contrast each argument in terms of objectivity and the types of evidence presented. evaluate and explain how the sources use effective evidence to support their claims.

health care plans in the united states having high costs because they are focusing on providing quality programs for different groups of individuals. the quality of the service is based on money flow received from the members. without this investment, couldn't be possible a constant scientific searching to prevent death and illness caused because of low levels of health investigation. currently, the complaints are not about the highest cost, but about the coverage and benefits to access the necessary health services required by the members.  

besides, if a global health system is established the quality levels will fall down because of the standardized of the health. the access to care will increase but the quality will be low because it depends on the money invested.

ok sorry the answer is a. by their religion

in which two ways were the northeast woodland indians and the southeast indians similar? both collaborated to form the iroquois confederacy. both cultivated the crops of corn, beans, and squash. both lived in rich environments of swamps and rivers. both lived in tree-bark dwellings called wigwams. both expected men to hunt, while women farmed.