Why was 2010 a significant year in burma? a) all economic sanctions were lifted b) aung san suu kyi became president c) national elections were allowed d) the junta stepped down

The correct answer is D. 2010 was a significant year in Burma because national elections were allowed.

Explanation:

After its independence from the United Kingdom in 1948, Burma was governed by a military dictatorship from 1962 to 2011, a period in which only two elections were held. In 1990 the military junta lost the election overwhelmingly to the National League for Democracy. In the face of such events, the government ignored the results. As part of a regime of repression, it arrested opposition leaders. After seventeen years, in 2007 the military junta was affected by massive protests led by Buddhist monks, who were brutally repressed. For the 2010 elections, the National League for Democracy was outlawed and could not participate by not expelling political prisoners from its ranks, as requested by the military junta. Since March 2018, the government is led by President Win Myint and Nobel Peace Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi as State Councilor.

hello there!

the graphics that you have attached within the question, indicates that few people in bolivia work in industry according to its labor force.

however, the graphic that is on the right side of the picture shows the gdp sector in bolivia. this gross domestic product is a macroeconomic magnitude   that shows the monetary value of all finished goods and services within a country's borders in a specific time period. in this case, the graphic is showing the monetary value in each sector -agriculture, industry and services- of bolivia in 2012.

so, although the first graphic located at the left side indicates that not so many people work in industry, this is the second most important sector according to the gdp metrics because of the monetary value that impacts on its country. it does not need to be the most valuable one. if it makes an impact on the country's economy, it will be definitely crucial to it.

explanation:

hitler's  "rise" can be considered to have ended in march 1933, after the reichstag adopted the enabling act of 1933 in that month. president paul von hindenburg had already appointedhitler  as chancellor on 30 january 1933 after a series of parliamentary elections and associated backroom intrigues.