Based on the supremacy clause, what must a judge support in the event of a legal conflict? a. state law over federal law b. city law over state lawc. the constitution over state law d. the presidents and pinion over the constitution

The Supremacy Clause is in the Article VI of the Constitution, second clause.

The correct option is option C. The Constitution over state law because it states:

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

This means, the Constitution is above any other state laws.

The constitution over state law ( C )

Explanation:

The supremacy clause as found in federal constitution of the United states of America clearly gives preferential treatment to federal laws over state laws, it means that in the case of when state laws and federal laws are conflicting each other that federal law supersedes what the state law says.

based on the supremacy clause as contained in the Constitution. the constitution supersedes state law. and the city law cannot supersede the state law as well. so a Judge must support that the constitution supersedes the state law in the event of legal conflict ( conflict between two laws )

where is the section with the question?

i think your answer there is c