subject
History, 30.06.2019 15:00 jaimes04

Why did historic indians have more permanent settlements than prehistoric indians? agriculture meant indians had to be sedentary. historic indians grew tired of moving. the nomadic lifestyle was bad for children. the animals used for food stopped migrating. which of the following was not a reason historic indians used rivers? washing horses drinking water trading fishing what technological advancement improved cooking options for prehistoric indians? pottery corn farming clovis points bow and arrow european accounts of early american indians often contained bias. true false neo-indians developed the atlatl. true false archaic indians created the bow and arrow. true false

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 18:50
Plz 50 points answer only if you know and dont copy from others draw conclusion explain how trade in the east african city-states resulted in a blending of cultures. provide examples
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 21:30
This chart shows american troop strength during what conflict? a) gulf war b) korean war c) vietnam war d) world war ii
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
Based on the information given and the gauges which process or processes have their alarm light on?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:30
If the imperial dynasty had continued to rule china, it is most likely that a) the economy would have improved rather than weakened b) european nations would have gotten more of a foothold in china c) revolutionary groups would not have gained any power in the country d) communism would not have received support among the poor
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Why did historic indians have more permanent settlements than prehistoric indians? agriculture mea...
Questions
question
Physics, 10.03.2021 20:20
question
Mathematics, 10.03.2021 20:20
question
Mathematics, 10.03.2021 20:20
question
Mathematics, 10.03.2021 20:20
question
English, 10.03.2021 20:20