Which statement about historical claims is correct? a. one reliable piece of evidence proves that a claim is valid, or correct. b. a good claim supported by many pieces of reliable evidence c. every claim can be proved or disproved using the available evidence. d. all claims are equally good because no evidence is completely reliable.

B i just took this test

B. A good claim supported by many pieces of reliable evidence

Explanation:

The historical sources are any testimony (written, oral, material) that allows the reconstruction, analysis and interpretation of historical events. Historical sources constitute the raw material of History. The diversity of historical sources can be object of different classifications according to their origin, the support in which they are found, the topic they address or to which they refer, intentionality (if they have one), etc. Because of their origin, historical sources are classified as primary or direct sources and secondary, indirect or historiographic sources.

hi!

your correct answer would be a

~courtney

hi friend   look late me tall   you with my experience first politic because this subject   it is more politic than be religious   and also give you my experience in islam

first   the islam it is not religion order to kill for we be clear .

so bin laden he not was man of religion   for he use they taught sound islamic theology.

osama bin laden he was influenced by mullah mohammad omar, a very radical manosama bin laden's little understanding of religion has made osama bin laden's speech radical and deviated from the teachings of islam

so the answer > they used radical persuasive rhetoric