subject
History, 03.07.2019 01:00 ashah1260

When evaluating past eras, historians depend on primary documents and other resources to understand the events and cultures. for instance, it would be difficult to evaluate why people incentive thought earth was at the center of the solar system unless you analyzed documents from the time in which the idea was relevant. what difficulties do you think might arise when trying to understand from the past, especially when those ideas are so different from our modern thinking? do you think primary resources show a complete picture of the period they are from? give an example or two to illustrate your answer. fast

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 22:00
Which of the following descriptions is an example of the curtual diffusion
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
What are two things china and canada have in common
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:30
What is a firm that specializes in buying and selling stocks for individual investors called?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:50
Which of the following describes a difference between an essay's body paragraph and its conclusion? o a. body paragraphs first introduce evidence, while a conclusion simply reminds readers of evidence. b. body paragraphs act as hooks for the reader, while the conclusion simply restates the essay's claim. c. body paragraphs can be any length, while the conclusion has a set number of sentences. d. body paragraphs restate the essay's claim, while the conclusion proposes claims for future essays.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
When evaluating past eras, historians depend on primary documents and other resources to understand...
Questions
question
English, 23.04.2020 01:38
question
Mathematics, 23.04.2020 01:38