Which sources would preserve the soft tissues of an early mammal? check all that apply. amber in russia frozen soil in the arctic shale in virginia sandstone in the badlands foraminifera in the ocean ice sheets in greenland

Soft tissues of early mammals would preserve under the following conditions:

The three possibilities shares a characteristic, which is the impossibility of microbes to act upon the organic compounds soft tissues are made of as they would under normal conditions. However, couple of years ago, paleontologist discovered a small mammal with preserved fur and internal organs (soft tissues), unearthed from 125-million-year-old rocks in central Spain, which could open the possibility for "sandstone in the Badlands" to be a correct answer too, but the fact  which discard this presumption is that Badlands oldest sandstone are 65 to 75 myo (Cretaceous Period), not fitting in the period in which the small mammal was found in Spain.

amber in Russia

frozen soil in the Arctic

ice sheets in Greenland

2 another reason colonist hello

3 reasons colonist gave for not supporting the revolution are

1 they were scared of the british

some colonist were scard of british because they know what the other colinest were doing was treason and could result in execution so they decided not to participate in it

2 some colonist were loyal to britian   which were called the loyalist

many families were serpeated   because of this son and father 1 wetn to fight in the war the other fought aganiust them which created alot of dispute between the family and   they were revolted that there families were fighting aganist them

3   aswell some colinist also   were promised freedom and protected for them to fight on the side of the british so they fought for the british in return for there freedom and protection

hope i !