The english bill of rights of 1689 declares that "the pretended power of suspending the laws to the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of parliament is illegal", a declaration supporting which concepts? select one: a. limited government and consent of the governed b. limited government and the divine right of kings c. absolute monarchy and autocracy d. home rule and constitutional monarchy

The right answer is D. The English Bill of Rights of 1689, formally known as “An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown", which granted Parliament more rights and power over the monarchy and determined that the monarchy could not rule without the consent of the Parliament.

P.S.: The document reads "...of suspending the laws OR the execution of laws by regal authority...".  

D. Home rule and constitutional monarchy

Explanation:

Taking into account the statements provided, we can affirm that statement C is correct, since it is the one that establishes the type of government that results from the bill of right. In 1689, and after the escape of King James II to France, the new Parliament drafted a Bill of Rights that recalls the respective obligations and duties of the King and Parliament. This document had to be sworn by Guillermo de Orange and María Estuardo, as a condition to occupy the throne of England.

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n: