Name the title given to rulers in florence, rome and venice

During the Roman empire, the given title to its ruler was the one of emperor. He was not considered as a king but as a republic’s leader. His main charges were being the consul and censor, president of the Senate, the empire’s principal priest and chief of the army too. Going to Florence, we can notice it was a city-state in where there was not an unique figure to represent the goverment but institutions. This was a particular charactheristics of the republics, the name of those institutions were: the Great Council (in which all the citizens participated), the 80 Council (smaller to solve the problems of the Great one), and the Senority (9 representatives who had to prevent that none of the citizens being above others). Regardig to Venice, the ruler was called Dux. They were lifetime elected to rule the city-state by its aristocracy, this is why it was called „a crowned republic”. In this only person all the political and religious powers fell.

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n: