What is the local, broad, and other context for anti-federalists vs federalists, 1780s?

In a historical point of view on federalism, which corresponds to a broad context, means the balance between forces, its purpose is "simultaneously to generate and maintain both unity and diversity" according to Daniel J. Alazar, that is, conserving the autonomy of each state.

In a local context, we can observe that in 1787, during the crisis that was raging at the time, a convention was held in which delegates from the 13 states were invited to the capital of the country: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to discuss and review articles of the Confederation that had the proposal of a strong and central State.

In other contexts, we can say that federalists and anti-federalists represent the birth of the United States, each side with its oppositions, giving the opposition the opportunity to make collections, nor allowing larger states to swallow smaller states and the emergence of a centralized state

explanation:

i think it is in quadrant 4.

the five year plans were part of a command economy. there was little choice in what would be emphasized for the current 5 year period.

the answer to democracy or totalitarianism is a bit harder. in stalin's time, russia was totalitarian. now that's not entirely true. putin has moved towards at least the boundary.