Though unemployment during the great depression was widespread, it was higher in some parts of the united states than in others. an economic historian creates a table based on existing unemployment data from the depression, while a cultural historian interviews people who were unemployed at the time. what information would the cultural historian receive that the economic historian would not? a. the level of unemployment in each state b. the names of specific people who were unemployed c. years when unemployment increased or decreased in different states d. stories about the experience of being unemployed

A cultural historian would get, by interviewing unemployed people during the Great Depression, B. The names of specific people who were unemployed and D. Stories about the experience of being unemployed.

This is because such historian would be doing microhistory, gathering information and stories about people directly from the source, while the economic historian would be doing macro-history, not paying attention to individuals.

idk lol i just wanna finish mines

the correct answer is:   "   3.6 % " .

          →   the unemployment rate is:   " 3.6 % " .

explanation:

to calculate the "unemployment rate" :

the "unemployment rate"   =

  [# of people unemployed] /   [working age population]   * 100 %   ;

                =   [9 million] / [250 million]     *   100 % ;

    →     note:   the units of "million" cancel out;

                    since:   " {million} / {million} = 1 " ;

                =   (9 / 250)   * 100 %   ;

                = 0.036 * 100 % ;

                =   3.6 %

answer:   the unemployment rate is:   " 3.6 % " .