The ruling in brown v. board of education did not immediately end segregation in public schools because
northern states refused to follow it.
the supreme court did not offer a new policy.
southern states closed all their public schools.
the supreme court could not agree on a new policy.

The ruling in Brown v. Board of Education did not immediately ended segregation in public schools because the Supreme Court could not agree on a new policy.

Further Explanations:

Racial discrimination in the United States was authorized by Jim Crow laws that prevented equality of the African Americans to that of white Americans. The law was applied in different provinces of America and was dominant both late in the 19th and 20th centuries. It totally facilitated racial discrimination between the native of America the African Americans.

Brown vs. Board of Education case (1954) the court stated separate but equal conveniences for both white and black citizens with a clear violation of the 14th amendment.Though ruling was important but was applicable for State Public Education System. The chief motive of the case was to abolish racial discrimination but the ruling made it more complex by establishing separate schools for Blacks and Whites. It was totally supporting the discrimination to more extent with excuse that the Supreme Court couldn’t agree for a new policy.

Learn more

Answer Details

Grade: High school

Subject: US History

Chapter: Brown vs. Board of Education

Keywords:

Brown vs. Board of Education,Racial discrimination, United States, Jim Crow, African Americans,racial discrimination,native of America,African Americans, 14th amendment, State Public Education System

The ruling in Brown v. Board of Education did not immediately end segregation in public schools because  the Supreme Court did not offer a new policy.

Explanation:

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka is a Supreme Court ruling, published on May 17, 1954. It declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional.

This ruling is undoubtedly the most important of the decisions of the Warren court. From a technical point of view, the Brown ruling was only applicable to the state's public education system; however the Bolling v. Sharpe ruling, less known and published the same day as Brown v. Board of Education, also extended the obligation to the federal government.

Despite the value of this ruling, the question of racial mixing in schools continued until the mid-1970s. The principle was established that the laws that imposed segregation had to disappear, as well as all policies designed to favor it, but once the laws were repealed and the policies replaced, there was still no effective action to remedy the effects of segregation itself.

6 or 2

explanation:

hope this you

but i think its 6

explanation:

ad the excerpt and i will gladly answer