Which french trade goods were most desired by american indians? a. fishhooks, knives, and other manufactured items b. gold, compasses, and wheat c. sugar, horses, and clothing d. spices, teas, and silks

A. fishhooks, knives, and other manufactured items

Explanation:

The firsts Europeans to buy furs from Indians were French and English anglers who, during the 1500s, angled off the shore of northeastern Canada and once in a while exchanged with the Indians. In return, the Indians got European-produced products, for example, weapons, metal cooking utensils, and cloth.

This exchange turned out to be lucrative to the point that numerous anglers deserted angling and made voyages to North America just to exchange hides, regularly before incredible adventurers, for example, Cartier, Giovanni Caboto (John Cabot), Henry Hudson, Giovanni da Verrazzano, and much Christopher Columbus made their well known voyages. While Cartier's voyages did not bring about enduring French settlement in North America, they expanded exchange between the French and Indians which had been going on before he arrived. All through the 1500s, French brokers routinely handled their boats at Tadoussac close to the intersection of the St. Lawrence and Saguenay Rivers and exchanged with Canadian Indians.

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

this is a good question! i'll do some research and come back when i have the answer!