Which of the following explains why the united states and european countries began playing a more active role in middle eastern politics in the early 20th century? a. israel was captured by palestinian arabs who forced all jews to leave the country. b. western businesses found large oil reserves throughout the middle east. c. the ottoman empire had developed the world's most powerful military. d. muslim extremists began trying to overthrow middle eastern democracies.

B. Western businesses found large oil reserves throughout the Middle East.

Explanation:

Unsatisfied with advancement in the Middle East, the US adopted another strategy to the equivalent assigned undertakings of harmony and territorial enrollment. In spite of the fact that the outcomes were frequently progressively sensational, at last the new attitude was presumably not any more viable. It very well may be best described by the new proactive position it took in the Arab-Israeli clash through a pledge to Israel.  

This relationship has been the most predictable and least addressed part of the US Middle East strategy. Only preceding, and following its autonomy, the subject of Israel was a disputable one in the United States. Policymakers realized that the production of a Jewish state in an Arab world would destabilize the Middle East and encourage Soviet interruption. In any case, the genius Israel weight was enormous. A little while later, Jewish powers had persuaded government officials and the nation to help Israel. Key authorities were liable to a steady flood of master Israel nonentities and Jewish pioneers. Likewise, the Jewish people group were a generous and ground-breaking possibility for chose legislators and for hopefuls in races. Realistic pictures filled in as suggestions to the all inclusive community of the hardships and enduring the Jews suffered amid the war. The nation was step by step expended in the expert Israel estimation. On an increasingly inconspicuous dimension, the country was normally progressively slanted to help the Jews: the Arab culture, and subsequently their circumstance was "outside" and troublesome for Americans to relate to. These variables added to a force which eventually left policymakers with no decision yet to help the new country.  

In spite of this solid help for Israel, the arrangement on the Arab-Israeli clash was subjected to the more extensive strategy of holding the line against Soviet development by structure a progressively dynamic arrangement of regulation. This was the responsibility, in principle. The United States needed to extend a picture of unbiased. In any case, the association with Israel dirtied that picture, and added to a general sentiment of doubt by the Arabs.

relations between the soviet union and the united states were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. the distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.

the united states government was initially hostile to the soviet leaders for taking russia out of world war i and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. although the united states embarked on a famine relief program in the soviet union in the early 1920s and american businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the new economic policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. by that time, the totalitarian nature of joseph stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the west. although world war ii brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating nazi germany, the soviet union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward eastern europe had created tensions even before the war ended.

the