History, 15.07.2019 23:30 uhhgray

In duckworth v. eagan (1988), the supreme court held that the police? a. had been too harshly burdened by the miranda decision and no longer had to follow it. b. could create their own miranda warning if it communicated the same message. c. did not need to read the miranda warning if they considered a suspect to be dangerous. d. could create any warning they chose so long as they got a conviction.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 15:00

What was the aim of impressionist painters? a to portray the lives of the rich, b to express a moment in the lives of ordinary people, c to create formal portraits, d to use classic painting techniques

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 02:20

What did this mean for dred scott? a.scott was not a citizen of the united states. b.scott was the property of the federal government. c.scott had no right to sue for his freedom in court. d.scott was considered the property of the slaveholding family.

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 07:00

Which of the choices below best describes columbus initial interaction with taino people

Answers: 3

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 11:00

According to this passage, what can be expected of people appointed as judges temporarily?

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

In duckworth v. eagan (1988), the supreme court held that the police? a. had been too harshly burde...