Baker v. carr (1962) involved a. unwarranted searches and seizures b. desegregation of schools c. the separation of church and state d. apportionment of legislative seats

d. apportionment of legislative seats

Explanation:

The case Baker v. Carr was a landmark case of the Supreme Court in which the Court argued that redistricting was a topic that the federal courts were allowed to examine. This was a response to the fact that the state of Tennessee has argued that redistricting was a political, and not a legal question. Redistricting is an important process in the United States as it determines the apportionment of legislative seats in Congress.

b.

explanation:

he is racist

"oh, lets coppy china and build a great wall around bla bla bla.that way,we wont lose out to other countries." in the end, he did not build anything

so the story tells of someone named kaushik choudhuri, but he does not narrate the story, a girl named hema does. hema tells the story in a second person point of view because you (the reader) are supposed to be the boy named kaushik.

here's an excerpt i found: "i was ushered into the fitting room, your mother watching approvingly as i took off my coat and sweater and tried on the bra."

source: