Which statement accurately contrasts how judaism and christianity developed? a. judaism developed through the growth of a single nation of people, while christianity developed through followers spreading the religion throughout the world. b. judaism developed from the growth of polytheism, while christianity developed through the development of theocracy. c. judaism developed through the spread of the greek language, while christianity developed through the roman occupation of jerusalem. d. judaism developed through the persecution of the jewish people, while christianity developed through the lack of persecution of its followers.

A. Judaism developed through the growth of a single nation of people, while Christianity developed through followers spreading the religion throughout the world.

Explanation:

Judaism is the millennial religion of a single nation of people: the Hebrew people. In this sense, Judaism is not a universal religion, it means that, while it is not impossible for non-Jews to convert to Judaism, Jews does not seek to convert other people to Judaism because it is only practiced by those who are born within the Hebrew people.

Christianity, on the other hand, was born as a branch of Judaism in the 1st century AD, and it was born as a universal religion, meaning that Christians of every century tried to spread their beliefs across the world. Christians practitioners in charge of spreading the Christian message to non-Christians are known as missionaries. For this reason, Christianity expanded through almost every continent to the point of becoming the largest religion (or set of religions) in the world today.

i believe your answer is d)

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.