Which reason best describes why presidential candidates campaign heavily in swing states? a. because these states are the only ones with electors b. because these states have the most electoral votes c. because these states have the largest populations of voters d. because no one candidate is certain to win the popular vote there

The correct answer is D.

A swing state refers to a state in American politics that could reasonably be won by either the Democratic or the Republican presidential candidate.

The opposite of a swing state is a safe state.

Because no candidate is certain to win the popular vote there, these states are targeted by both major-party campaigners, especially if the election is considered to be a close one. In the final stages of the electoral campaign, the candidates may campaign only in the swing states and concentrate heavily on campaign advertising there.

Some of the traditional swing states in the USA are: New Hampshire, Colorado, Michigan, Minnesota, Florida and Iowa.

slim jim pickle bim bang bongo babado

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is