Joshua is researching diabetes treatments online. which criteria indicate that the provider of this information is likely a reliable source? check all that apply. the provider is on a for-profit website. the provider is on a nonprofit website. the provider is the seller of the product. the provider is on the insurance company’s website. the provider will not profit from the purchase.

The provider is on a nonprofit website, and the provider will not profit from the purchase.  Only these two out of the five choices can be considered as the reliable source in regards to Joshua’s research about diabetes treatments because of the following reasons:

Nonprofit website, as the name itself doesn’t aim to get money or any profit using their website. Mostly of the nonprofit websites aim to help educate the people for free and without charge, thus writing the information in their website based on the writer’s experience or knowledge, just like how Wikipedia and wikihow work. 

Next, if the provider will not profit from the purchase, it means it is a customer review which is solely all about the provider’s experience in using the certain diabetes treatment.  This simply means that all the information provided is based solely on the experience of the author rather than a marketing strategy, which also means an honest opinion.

The other choices just provide and write the diabetes treatment result simply because their website is gaining profit from advertising the products or treatment, rather than purely helping Joshua to know more about the real diabetes treatments.

The provider is on nonprofit website

The provider will not profit from the purchase

no way! i don't want to spend my night being sick!