Directions: Read each statement carefully and put a check mark (/) on the statement that is correct and (X) if it is incorrect. Write your answer before the number. 1. Training for competitive sports should be planned and done carefully. 2. Proper warm-up prepares our body in performing different activities and avoid injuries. 3. . Injuries can be caused by insufficient time spent on warm-up and cool-down. 4. Engaging in exercise and sports decreases the possibility of experiencing other common injuries. 5. The principle of variation is a good way to prevent and minimize injuries. 6. Variety is needed in training not only to prevent boredom but also to ensure complete and full development of fitness. 7. You should not devote time for rest when you exercise. 8. Cross training is an effective way to add variety in your exercise program. 9. You can progress from just plain sports participation to more complex and detailed involvement when you become serious about your health. 10. Training for dual sports entails knowing the components of fitness that are needed in these sports. 11. The intensity of your exercise is crucial to your improvement. 12. A fitness goal is a specific training objective or physical challenge for yourself. 13. Training guidelines are not necessary in dual sports participation. 14. Individuals who train too hard and do not allow adequate time for rest are susceptible to a hyperkinetic condition. 15. Volleyball is an example of dual sports.

Identify at least three occupations in each area of the hospital organization

Hi i need comment on my homework or something to add. *argue for and against quantitative and qualitative techniques respectively. which ones would you lean towards when conducting an investigation and why?   quantitative techniques, usually presented through surveys, are more practical, take less time, and can design samples in which any person or household of the target audience has the same probability of participating. however, the questionnaires must be carefully written by highly trained professionals, in such a way that they do not contain ambiguous or biased questions, that they are easily understandable by any member of the sample, and that they contemplate all the objectives of the research. besides that they do not allow to deepen in the reason of the facts. qualitative techniques, on the other hand, are based on the observation of natural behaviors, discourses, open responses for the subsequent interpretation of meanings. studying reality in its natural context can be extremely useful to learn more about the phenomenon studied. however, more specialization is required, they are not applicable to statistics, so it is not possible to make measurements, it entails a higher cost per studied population (which is also reduced), whose results do not necessarily represent the general population. i believe that knowing the situation of the general population, through statistics is essential. in addition, because of the possibility of studying a much larger population in less time and with less amount of economic resources, i would lean towards quantitative research.

An example of maslow's need for safety is reaching goals through self-discipline