Should schools open with the corona virus going around give 3 points for amd againsts with conclusions and writing techniques

if you do it i will give u brainliest and 5 stars and a follow pls help me

for -

it could save millions of lives. going to school, everybody spreads everything around, if somebody catches something you're more than likely to get it too.

able to spend more time with family. spending time with your family is important and healthy for good relationships/friendships and most kids/teens dont get enough time with there family due to being at school for 7 hours each day then coming home to do homework.

you're able to have a little extra "you" time which we all need now and then. if you dont take time for yourself you can get in a really bad habit of not taking care of yourself and that'll affect your physical health AND mental heath.

against-

kids could skip school way more easily. kids/teens could not find school as important because they're not actually getting up and going which can put you on truancy. then you'll have a bunch of legal stuff to deal with which is never fun

mental health could go way down. by not seeing your friends everyday like you normally did and if you're just staying in your room all day sleeping, you can get into a really bad routine and without a structured routine your mental health will be highly affected.

nutrition will most likely be highly affected. at school you get food and are forced to take one fruit and one vegetable, some people might not want to get it but when its in front of them, they normally eventually eat it and if you're home without that push of eating healthy then you'd just eat junk food or not eat at all and then your physical health would lower and you'll be more prone to getting sick

i think they should leave schools closed. both of these options some bad issues or be dangerous but i think that opening schools would be highly more dangerous than not due to the fact that everything gets spread around and more people would be in danger.

Explanation:

low context culture   (lc.):

association:    

relationships begin and end quickly. many people can be inside one's circle; circle's boundary is not clear.

things get done by following procedures and paying attention to the goal.

one's identity is rooted in oneself and one's accomplishments.

social structure is decentralized; responsibility goes further down (is not concentrated at the top).

interaction:

low use of nonverbal elements. message is carried more by words than by nonverbal means.

verbal message is explicit. context is less important than words.

verbal message is direct; one spells things out exactly.

communication is seen as a way of exchanging information, ideas, and opinions.  

disagreement is depersonalized. one withdraws from conflict with another and gets on with the task. focus is on rational solutions, not personal ones. one can be explicit about another's bothersome behavior.

territoriality:

space is compartmentalized and privately owned; privacy is important, so people are farther apart.

temporality:

things are scheduled to be done at particular times, one thing at a time. what is important is that activity is done efficiently.

change is fast. one can make change and see immediate results.

time is a commodity to be spent or saved. one’s time is one’s own.

learning:

reality is fragmented and compartmentalized. one source of information is used to develop knowledge. thinking is inductive, proceeds from specific to general. focus is on detail.

learning occurs by following explicit directions and explanations of others.

an individual orientation is preferred for learning and problem solving.

speed is valued. how efficiently something is learned is important.

hope that                                         : )