Scientists worldwide agree that atmospheric carbon dioxide enhances the greenhouse effect. however, they differ in their opinions about the effects that the enhanced greenhouse effect has on the global climate. which is the most likely effect of the differing opinions among scientists, regarding global warming? a. all old ideas would be discarded. b. scientific evidence would be weakened. c. new ideas would be created and tested. d. the limitations of science would be evident.

C. new ideas would be created and tested

C. New ideas would be created and tested.

Explanation:

As global warming is happening in a large scale the scientist around the world are confused with whom to blame, but its not just the people that are responsible for this the given scientific evidence also provides of the fact that the life on earth is getting older and that earth along with its resources wealth is running out and going to get depleted fast as many countries have failed to understand the true potential of the nature they tend to blame there ideas. The scientific community does accept any sort of unstable hypothesis and hence focus on the new ideas and the try to test these out on a trial basis like the impact of the greenhouse and rise in the temperatures of places. Thus they are bound to differ in opinion and thus give new theories continuously.

It would be tomatoes i believe