What is the missing reason in the proof? A 2-column table has 5 rows. Column 1 is labeled Statement with entries angle A is-congruent-to angle D, line segment C D is parallel to line segment A B, line segment C B is-congruent-to line segment B C, angle A B C is-congruent-to angle D C B, triangle A B C is-congruent-to triangle D C B. Column 2 is labeled Reason with entries given, given, reflective property, alternating interior angles are congruent, question mark.

alt. ext. Angles are ≅
ASA
AAS
corr. int. Angles are ≅