How do the locations of ancient and modern Indian cities differ? Ancient cities developed only in inland regions, while modern cities developed along the coast.
Ancient cities developed in mountains, while modern cities developed along the Ganges River.
Ancient cities developed along the Arabian Sea, while modern cities developed mainly on the Bay of Bengal.
Ancient cities developed mainly along the Indus River, while modern cities developed near different bodies of water.

Ancient cultures tended to depend on rivers since rivers supplied populations with drinking water and irrigation.  Overtime, however, technology has changed and grown and we can develop cities in regions that would seem unsuitable for the past.  Also, cities have shifted from becoming places located for the sole purpose of survival to becoming places located for convenience.  I hope this helps you out.

Its D

Explanation:

Ancient cities developed mainly along the Indus River, while modern cities developed near different bodies of water.

Youre welcome =

there's multiple reasons why the conquistadors were so successful in colonizing central america, and some of them are:

- they were seen as gods;

at the beginning, the spanish settlers were seen by the natives as gods, and this was mainly due to their white skin, and the way they came with their boats.

- possessed superior weaponry;

the spanish had gunpowder and guns, as well as cannons, while the natives did not had any fire weapons.

- made cleaver alliances;

they used the situation of tribes hating each other, so they made alliances with some of them which served them very well.

- brought diseases;

the native people were not immune to certain diseases the europeans brought with them, so they were dying from seeming harmless things for european standards.

i i think it might b c