Why was the Latin Revolution not that Revolutionary? Provide at least 3 reasons.

One reason evolution would have faster without independence evolution and most of the British Empire Decour night eight 1830 for the following the passage of slavery evolution act the left of our Indian but slavery was banned in there too in 1943 in England.
Reason2: Independent was bad for native Americans starting in the proclamation proclamation of 1763 the British come lawn your government please firm limits on Western settlement in the United States.
Reason3: American would have a better system of government if we’re stuck with Britain honestly I think earlier evolution alone is enough to make the case against revolution and it combined with less horrible through treatment of American Indians is more than enough

Ithink its deforestation.