In one hypothesis about the origin of life on earth, scientists propose that organic molecules were produced from inorganic molecules in chemical reactions. how would you evaluate a scientist's claim that reactions, showing organic molecules emerging from inorganic molecules, can be seen in nature today?
a) the claim must be false because modern-day evolution cannot be observed and recorded.
b) the claim is likely to be false because the current conditions on earth are opposed to the formation of life.
c) the claim is likely to be true because all the elements necessary for the formation of organic molecules are present on earth.
d) the claim must be true because scientists are able to replicate these reactions in a lab.

Tone. one cool fact i found studying greek mythology is the connection to modern names. for instance, my hometown, east sparta, ohio, is named after the home of the awesome greek warriors! which revision of spencer's essay best uses a formal tone? one interesting fact i found studying greek mythology is the connection to modern names. my hometown is east sparta, ohio, which is named after the home of the fierce greek warriors. isn't it interesting how greek mythology connects to modern names? east sparta, ohio, for instance, is named after sparta in greece, which you know is home to the strong greek warriors. an interesting fact about greek mythology is its connection to many modern names. one example is east sparta, ohio, a town that takes its name from the home of greece's famous warriors. have you noticed how many modern names come from greek mythology? i didn't know until now that my hometown, east sparta, ohio, is named after the home