1. how does the trailer compare to the book? is it an accurate representation of the story you read? why or why not? for the boy in the striped pajamas

Comparing the trailer with the book version, "The Boy in the Stripped Pyjamas", it can be said as incomplete as it isn't able to really include in the movie each and every element and themes of the written work.

Explanation:

The movie focuses on all the characters while the book version is mainly from the perspective of the child narrator, Bruno.

While the novel, as it rightly should, provide detailed backgrounds of the story, the trailer just gives a peak into what the book is about.

Just as the difference in their volume also suggests, the movie just shows parts of the whole story while the readers of the book will have more in-depth knowledge of how the story goes.

The trailer is and can never be an accurate representation of the story from the book.

the characters in string all have major secrets that they strive to avoid revealing throughout the play.

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest