David likes peaunt butter, people who like peaunt butter are j-erks, david is a j-erk which best identifies an error in the soundness of this argument 1. the claims do not provide enough information to support the conclusion that is reached 2. the writer is stereotyping david just because he likes peanut butter 3. its possible that david is not among the group because he likes peanut butter and are j-erks 4. the arugment does not matter because its not worthwhile topic

Read the excerpt from "politics and the english language" by george orwell. by this morning’s post i have received a pamphlet dealing with conditions in germany. the author tells me that he "felt impelled” to write it. i open it at random, and here is almost the first sentence that i see: "[the allies] have an opportunity not only of achieving a radical transformation of germany’s social and political structure in such a way as to avoid a nationalistic reaction in germany itself, but at the same time of laying the foundations of a cooperative and unified europe.” which statement is correct? orwell uses an example and statistical evidence in this excerpt. orwell uses an example and a quotation for evidence in this excerpt. orwell uses hypothetical and factual evidence in this excerpt. orwell uses hypothetical and statistical evidence in this excerpt.