Why is this considered an example of feedback provided during the peer-review process? a. it focuses on making the author feel better about his or her paper. b. it gives specific examples of ways the author can improve the paper. c. it provides the author with the reviewer's personal opinion of the paper. d. it offers the author a chance to refute the advice of the reviewer.

The correct answer is B. It gives specific examples of ways the author can improve the paper.

Explanation:

Feedback, which is part of the peer-review process consists of evaluating and creating a critique about a work such as a text or presentation of a peer, which can be a classmate or colleague. However, for a peer-review to be both positive and effective, the person that is providing the feedback should first analyze carefully the work to be evaluated, acknowledge the positive aspects of the work and then point out those that need to be improved including recommendations on the way to making the work better. This is recommended because the main purpose is to help the other to improve rather than just criticizing the work. Considering this, the statement that is an example of helpful feedback is "it gives specific examples of ways the author can improve the paper".

idk

explanation:

i suggest it is anadiplosis