Can the use of violence ever be a justifiable means to achieve an end goal or bring about real change? why or why not (provide examples from history or from today’s current state of affairs)? think of groups of people today, whom might be opposed to using violence to urge on social justice. why might these groups be opposed? (3-4 paragraphs)

I would say no. I know other people with more than likely disagree but in all honesty the answer should be no. If you can't manage to convince or change someones thoughts or opinions with words, you might as well give up at that point. Using said violent actions will only further ignite the issue and cause way more problems on both sides. Then the side who opposes your cause will then fight back even more.

The correct answer is c. maybe