subject
English, 26.07.2019 04:00 milkshakegrande101

Read the following summary of the supreme court majority opinion in the tinker v. des moines case: two students wore black armbands to school to protest the vietnam war. the school district suspended the students. the supreme court determined that wearing the armbands is an expression of free speech, protected by the first amendment, and it was not disruptive in the school setting. in addition, the school had allowed other students to wear controversial symbols without suspension. if a supreme court justice were to disagree with the majority opinion, which issue would be most important in forming the dissent? a. the district feared, but could not prove, that the armbands caused disruption. b. the two students in question were under the age of 18. c. none of the other students were bothered by the armbands. d. there is precedent for schools limiting student expression.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 00:00
What is the meaning of "full tide" as it is used in this sentence? before i could explain to her the differences of language in this world, she was embarked on the full tide of another subject. a long and involved argument an inaccurate representation a detailed and lively discussion an uncontrollable flood
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:10
Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeellllllllllllllpppppppppppp asap
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 06:10
What is the correct def of moif? an idea or object that recurs in a text
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:10
Swift’s satire that tells of three brothers’ coats is
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Read the following summary of the supreme court majority opinion in the tinker v. des moines case:...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 19.09.2019 04:30
question
English, 19.09.2019 04:30