Which sentences in this excerpt from “civil disobedience” by henry david thoreau indicate the author's belief that the government is subordinate to the people? no man with a genius for legislation has appeared in america. they are rare in the history of the world. (there are orators, politicians, and eloquent men, by the thousand; but the speaker has not yet opened his mouth to speak who is capable of settling the much-vexed questions of the day.) we love eloquence for its own sake, and not for any truth which it may utter, or any heroism it may inspire. (our legislators have not yet learned the comparative value of free trade and of freedom, of union, and of rectitude, to a nation.) they have no genius or talent for comparatively humble questions of taxation and finance, commerce and manufactures and agriculture. (if we were left solely to the wordy wit of legislators in congress for our guidance, uncorrected by the seasonable experience and the effectual complaints of the people, america would not long retain her rank among the nations.) for eighteen hundred years, though perchance i have no right to say it, the new testament has been written; yet where is the legislator who has wisdom and practical talent enough to avail himself of the light which it sheds on the science of legislation? the authority of government, even such as i am willing to submit to- for i will cheerfully obey those who know and can do better than i, and in many things even those who neither know nor can do so well- is still an impure one: to be strictly just, it must have the sanction and consent of the governed. it can have no pure right over my person and property but what i concede to it. the progress from an absolute to a limited monarchy, from a limited monarchy to a democracy, is a progress toward a true respect for the individual. (even the chinese philosopher was wise enough to regard the individual as the basis of the empire.) is a democracy, such as we know it, the last improvement possible in government? is it not possible to take a step further towards recognizing and organizing the rights of man? (there will never be a really free and enlightened state until the state comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all its own power and authority are derived, and treats him accordingly.) i myself with imagining a state at least which can afford to be just to all men, and to treat the individual with respect as a neighbor; which even would not think it inconsistent with its own repose if a few were to live aloof from it, not meddling with it, nor embraced by it, who fulfilled all the duties of neighbors and fellow-men. a state which bore this kind of fruit, and suffered it to drop off as fast as it ripened, would prepare the way for a still more perfect and glorious state, which also i have imagined, but not yet anywhere seen.