Which would be the best way of describing the structure of thoreau’s observations in "civil disobedience"? -he moves from a consideration of his surroundings to an evaluation of the state as a whole. -he develops a critique of his jail cell into a critique of the entire prison system and justice department. -he uses the example of his case as a way to introduce his condemnation of the court. -he moves from a description of his jail cell to his reaction to being imprisoned.

The correct answer is:

He moves from a consideration of his surroundings to an evaluation of the state as a whole.

Explanation:

Civil Disobedience is an essay written by Henry David Thoreau, and published in 1849, and served as an inspiration of non-violent protest throughout the world.

Thoreau moved from consideration of his surroundings to an evaluation of the state as a whole in this essay stating that governments tend to be unjust, and that democracy is not a solution for injustice, he stated that if an individual doesn't agree with the government, then he or she has the right to not participate in rules and obligations demanded by that government (which is why he refused to pay his taxes). He made an evaluation of the state as a whole by stating that the United States was acting as an unjust government supporting slavery and participating in wars.

i belive the answer is b given there isnt much information