Ok Brianly, can y'all shorten something up for me please? Money has flowed into the political fundraising arm of the anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony List in the nearly two months since a conservative majority of Supreme Court justices expressed openness to dramatic new abortion restrictions. According to numbers presented with the Associated Press, the organization has collected $20 million in committed cash contributions, five times more than it had at the start of an election year in its 30-year history. The group had already approved its largest-ever political budget, $72 million, for 2022, prior to the recent spike. This is approximately $20 million more than it spent in 2020, which was a presidential election year. The cash on hand essentially ensures that the Supreme Court's abortion decision, expected this summer, will do nothing to sooth one of the country's most vexing issues. Abortion opponents said they'll invest their recently bought funds in the November elections. A Mississippi law restraining abortions beyond 15 weeks is being considered by the Supreme Court. Anti-abortion groups predicted that if the bill is maintained, the focus will shift to Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Kansas. These are states that have Republican legislatures but Democratic governors, who are all up for re-election in November. If the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, having established a constitutional right to abortion for women, governors in Michigan and Wisconsin would be incapable to overturn restrictions in their states that existed prior to the 1973 decision. However, these governors would be the only ones standing in the way of new legislation imposed by Republican legislatures, such as outright bans on the surgery. Supporters of abortion rights are highly aware of the importance of governors' elections to their cause, which is heightened by the potential of a Supreme Court defeat. She did decline on specifying how much money to budget. Some Democratic governors desiring re-election are stressing their commitment to maintaining access in some form. Abortion opponents, on the other hand, are obviously euphoric as the Supreme Court judgment approaches. The March for Life, which took place on a very chilly day in Washington last week, drew thousands of people who expressed excitement and confidence about the likelihood of Roe v. Wade being reversed. However, the political implications of such a move might be explosive for both parties. A ruling that severely restricts abortion access might energize Democrats in the run-up to the November election. According to a December study by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, the topic is already gaining traction among Democrats. According to the poll, 13% of Democrats want the federal government to address the problem of abortion or reproductive rights. This is up from fewer than 1% of Democrats declaring it a priority for 2021 and 3% declaring it a priority in 2020. Religious conservatives, who have spent decades working on the subject and created an odd partnership with Donald Trump to achieve their goals, are also at risk. Former President George W. Bush, which have already shown support for abortion rights, eventually appointed three justices to the Supreme Court, significantly changing it and threatening Roe v. Wade. Conservatives may be upset and less interested in voting in the midterm elections if the justices fail to overturn the ruling or reach a compromise. Opponents, on the other hand, claim to be encouraged by a sense of momentum for the time being.