Prompt: Who was more at fault for the feud between the Hatfields and the McCoys? Write a TBEAEAR Paragraph in which you make your argument. T= Topic Sentence
B= Background
E= Evidence
A= Analysis
E= Evidence
A= Analysis
R= Restatement

(T) The Hatfields were at more at fault compared to the McCoys

(B) If the Hatfields had allowed the marriage they could have prevented all of the next few years of tragedy and violence.

(E) When Roseanne McCoy and Jhonse Hatfield fell in love the hatfields already didn't agree with this so Roseanne had to move to Jhonse's family along with this after a while, Jhonse the person she had left her family for, bertrayed her for their 16 year old cousin causing Rose to d!e from the heartbreak

even towards the future Hatfield (specifically William anderson hatfield) was overly violent and always resorted to some form of violence towards innocent people because of what their ancestors did

(A) When Rose moved to the Hatfields she was risking her own safety (since the tension was already high between the 2 families the Hatfields could have easily tried to harm her) it was really immature of them to do all of this because of a stolen pig

(E) While we don't know the exact reason on how she passed it is commonly believed that it happened because of heartbr3ak while this is unlikely it's still possible It can happen when a highly emotional or stressful incident causes a surge in stress hormones These hormones can cause short-term cardiac failure, which is potentially life-threatening.

It's also possible that she could have made a poor decision on the spur of the moment and resorted to s3lf-h4rm

(A) After all of this it's understandable how Roseanne was heartbroken having someone she trusted just leave her for another close relative along with the pain of losing her child

While Roseanne's death may not have been caused by violence, Jhonse's betrayal of someone who trusted him more than their own family was truly callous.

(R) In conclusion, while the McCoys had a number of unjustified actions, the Hatfeilds just take the cake when it comes to this.

brainliest would be appreciated if this helped you i spent a long time writing this (◕_◕﹡;  )

yes it is like you know me bro

the speech this question is referring to is president kennedy's special message to the congress on urgent national needs, may 25, 1961

kennedy responds in a very direct and concrete way to those thinking that communism is a positive system:

"yet their aggression is more often concealed than open. they have fired no missiles; and their troops are seldom seen. they send arms, agitators, aid, technicians and propaganda to every troubled area. but where fighting is required, it is usually done by others--by guerrillas striking at night, by assassins striking alone--assassins who have taken the lives of four thousand civil officers in the last twelve months in vietnam alone--by subversives and saboteurs and insurrectionists, who in some cases control whole areas inside of independent nations." (kennedy)

president kennedy presents communism as cowardly, as a hidden and treacherous weapon that strikes from the shadows like thieves, he represents the system as not even being capable of showing and open and overt attack or confrontation. to finish up the response, he expresses that the system attacks even a country's idependence and freedom.