In recent years, some painters of graffiti have been winning recognition as artists. But since graffiti is vandalism, painting graffiti is inherently an act of rebellion and lawbreaking. For this reason, painting graffiti is not art. Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion? a. Some graffiti is painted in remote places, where it will not be used by any law enforcer or anyone else.
b. Some painters of graffiti are more concerned than others with the illegal nature of the paintings they produce.
c. Painters of graffiti should be more concerned with the illegality of their paintings than they currently are.
d. An object is not an art object if its maker might be motivated primarily by questions of whether or not creating that object is permissible.
e. Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.