The philosopher Peter Singer argues that universal hunger and poverty issues would come to an end if the world's wealthy gave back any money, funds, or capital they did not use or need. That
there is no need for luxury items or vast investments that do not benefit others.
In his New York Times Magazine article, “The Singer Solution to World Poverty," the author calls
for the developed world to immediately come to the realization that it wastes a good deal of
money and resources that would otherwise help lesser nations. Write an essay in which you
explore the positives and negatives of this argument. Listed below are some ideas from the essay
that you should embed into your response.