Are Carlson’s actions in Chapter 3 justified? Write 300-400 words arguing whether you believe Carlson is justified. Is his treatment of Candy, as well as Candy’s dog, ethical? Why or why not? Support your answer with evidence from the text. I will give someone a brainliest!

What background knowledge would best support this inference about mario?

Read the following conclusion for an essay that claims that extreme sports should be more highly regulated because they are too dangerous: whether it is a high level of physical exertion, or extra doses of the "fear factor," it is common for extreme athletes to beat at the door of fate. it is these people who tempt their own mortality, while curious onlookers wait anxiously for the outcome, who must be protected from themselves. which statement provides the most accurate evaluation of the paragraph? a. the closing statement is unsatisfying b. the passage introduces new evidence. c. the thesis is not restated. d. the style is informal and inconsistent.

"introduction to oedipus the king": what is most likely the author's intent in writing about the difference(s) between sophocles's play and the original myth on which it's based?