3. In several instances (such as paras. 7 and 15), Anzaldúa points out the sexism inherent in the communities she is writing about. Explain whether you think this discussion is part of her overall point about the consequences of language bias and domination, or whether it is a separate point.

i literally just read the book and studied it for months so i could you, but i need to know where these questions are coming from. they are too general.

very interesting story but where is the question what is actually a question i don't understand

impartial means: treating all rivals or disputants equally; fair and just.

i would say that impartial is agreeing with something, because impartial means to treat your rivals, arguments, and reasoning equally and fair. so if you rival says something, agreeing on it means you did the impartial.