How does the repetition of stanzas from Part I that appear at the end of Part II of "The Highwayman" influence the poem's meaning? It reminds the reader that what happens at the end of the poem is different from what happens in the beginning.

It foreshadows how the ending of the poem could be different for Bess and the highwayman.

It shows the similarities between the story people tell after the highwayman's death and what actually happens.

It highlights the role that the landlord plays in the love between Bess and the highwayman.

FIRST ONE WILL GET 10 POINTS

i will work on it

explanation:

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest

answer: may i see the sentences?