How does the speaker's point of view influence how the rose is described in “The Rose That Grew from Concrete”? The Rose That Grew From Concrete

Did you hear about the rose that grew
from a crack in the concrete?
Proving nature's law is wrong it
learned to walk without having feet.
Funny it seems, but by keeping its dreams,
it learned to breathe fresh air.
Long live the rose that grew from concrete
when no one else ever cared.

A. Curious about the rose, the speaker asks several questions about it.

B. Believing that the rose is not real, the speaker exaggerates its qualities.

C. Feeling pity for the rose, the speaker lists all of the hardships it has faced.

D. Impressed by the rose, the speaker explains what makes it so admirable.

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

idk

explanation:

there is no picture just let me know what it is and i can you tho : ) mark me the brainliest ? have a good day

a because jakie robinson was baseball player so surely he has to do something with sports  lol a lot of acronyms to get my points