How was the Civil Rights Act of 1964 a check on the power of the states? The act required all states to follow federal guidelines, which resulted in state laws being overturned.
The act required people to participate in civil rights protests and boycotts, which cost the states money.
The act resulted in states passing more laws aimed at the restricting the rights of different groups.
The act resulted in civil rights leaders pushing President Johnson and the federal government to take action.

different strategies reach different people based on their ability to understand the material. (from personal experience) when writing an argumentative essay write explaining the subject as though your audience never heard of it before and it is just being introduced, then explain why other people hate it also, afterward you would explain why that would be wrong. i hope that : )

u forgot to wipe

explanation:

in "people in peace, not profit and war" chrisholm uses inductive reasoning for her argument against defense spending by stating that the new administration, like most americans, wanted to invest in social objectives, so they must not want to prioritize defense spending. mr. nixon said "we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problem that beset them", but chrisholm points out that the programs were delayed anyways.