subject
English, 04.11.2021 20:00 sidneylww

In Cameron’s argument on the artistic value of video games, she wrote this introduction. Roger Ebert once wrote an article titled, “Video Games Can Never Be Art.” In this article he wrote that no game is “worthy of comparison with the great dramatists, poets, filmmakers, novelists, and composers.” This may be true right now, but it’s inevitable that video games will rise to have just as much or more artistic importance than film, poetry, theater, and television. We’re witnessing the childhood phase of the dominant art form of the future.

Which of the following pieces of evidence supports her claim?

A .The museum of modern art now includes video games.

B .The video game industry is a multi-billion dollar industry.

C . Advances in video game graphics are happening faster and faster.

D. Video games are no longer the domain of children, as more and more adults are starting to enjoy them.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 02:30
Hey guys! is it right to say -in the future, advanced technology will create robots capable of doing everything that humans can-? , i need your ! it's urgent
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:00
In the space below, write a five-paragraph, 600-800 word persuasive essay arguing whether or not your chosen speech is effective in communicating its message, based on how it uses rhetorical strategies. include a clear thesis statement identifying whether, in your view, the speaker's argument is effective, based on his or her use of rhetorical strategies. explain why or why not. give your audience a sense of closure by providing a clear conclusion. throughout the essay, be sure to: use formal, objective language for an academic audience, connect your ideas using transitions that clearly tie together your ideas, base your argument on evidence from the text of the speech, and provide a clear conclusion about the speech's effectiveness.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:30
Read this passage from an analysis essay: allegories do three things. first, they tell a story. allegories also have multiple meanings. finally, allegories offer a moral lesson. which best uses parallelism to revise this passage? a. telling a story, having multiple meanings, and moral lessons: these are the things allegories do. b. allegories, tell a story, multiple meanings, and a moral lesson. c. allegories tell a story, have multiple meanings, and offer a moral lesson. d. allegories tell a story, and have multiple meanings and offer a moral lesson.2b2t
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:30
What is your interpretation of “the story of my experiments with turth”?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
In Cameron’s argument on the artistic value of video games, she wrote this introduction. Roger Ebe...
Questions
question
Physics, 20.07.2019 14:50
question
Health, 20.07.2019 14:50