Please help me answer all of these questions in this article ASAP. The Meat Market by Alex Tabarrok

1. What, according to Tabarrok, is “the great paradox of deceased donation”?

2. What positive developments in the last several decades have “led to fewer potential brain-dead donors than in the past”?

3. How has Iran eliminated shortages in transplanted?

4. How do Singapore and Israel promote donation without using financial compensation?

5. What is your reaction to the title and opening of the essay?

6. Although he mentions the dividing line between life and death, he avoids discussing the issue in the essay. Do you think this strengthens or weakens his argument?

7. Tabarrok is an economist. How does his background influence the way he approaches the subject?

8. Do you think that paying for organs in unethical? Why or why not?

1. Indeed, the great paradox of deceased donation is that we must draw the line between life and death precisely where we cannot be sure of the answer, because the line must lie where the donor is dead but the donor's organs are not.

2. Brain death has been reduced as a result of improved automotive safety and reduced crime.

3. The adoption of the legalized and compensated living-unrelated donor renal transplant program in 1988 eliminated the need for Iranian patients for commercial or illegal paid transplants abroad.

4. Singapore is preparing to pay donors as much as 50,000 ... Israel is implementing a "no give, no take"

5. You do this part :)

6. It's a weakens because that's the whole point. (Add more to this if you'd like)

7. Tabarrok understands the ways in which financial factors drive people and shape society in a way that physicians or members of the clergy may not. He looks at things more logically and focuses on the idea of supply and demand and uses this perspective to think of ways in which the organ donation system could be improved, which works well for him.

8. Whatever the context, compensation for organs is illegal under Section 301 of the National Organ Transplant Act: “It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any human organ for valuable consideration” (Public Law 98-507).

explanation

old disney was more kid oriented as appose to new disney it's more teen oriented.i guess what i'm trying to say is new disney is way more mature and out there then old disney. for instance all you see in new disney is bf/gf drama and old disney it was nothing like that. kids are growing up and as coorpations like disney, nickolden etc they tend to follow what kids follow so they can have more views . therefore   they have inferred   that now days kids want to have relationships and stuff so that's what disney gives them.