In context, which is the best version of the underlined portion of this sentence? George Washington Carver, a highly accomplished scientist and a widely respected educator, he was born into slavery in 1864 in Missouri.

educator, was born into slavery in 1864 in Missouri.

educator, born into slavery was he in 1864 in Missouri.

educator he was born into slavery in 1864 in Missouri.

educator who was in 1864 born into slavery in Missouri.

educator, who into slavery in Missouri was born in 1864.

it might be feelings and action sorry if i am wrong

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.

pretty sure the answers are 1 b 2 c idk hope it is right