Take on the role of a colonist in pre-Revolutionary America. In a letter to your (fictional) cousin in Great Britain, make your argument for the colonies' independence, using specific references to the reasoning and evidence in Henry's speech or Paine's text. Your assignment should include the following elements:
A well-established claim that's clearly related to and differentiated from the claim you're arguing against
Relevant evidence that supports your claim and rebuts your counterclaim
A clear organization of ideas, including transitions between ideas and an ending that wraps everything up
You should have completed a draft of this assignment in the activity before this one. If you haven't done so, go back and complete that activity now.

Ask yourself these questions as you revise:
Did I establish a clear claim about the colonies' independence from Great Britain?
Is my claim clearly related to the claim in my fictional cousin's letter?
Is the evidence I've used relevant?
Have I given a solid rebuttal to the counterclaim?

serious answers only
big as points plus brainliest need it done today please

When writing, you should mention all the tyrannical deeds that the king has committed against the people of the colonies. It's easy if you take Paine's texts as a source because they are full of evidence. The simplest can be that Monarchies are bad because all men are equal so a king cannot rule since he is equal to all other people.

Explanation:

Hope this helps:)

huck's relationship with food is a prominent theme throughout the novel, and during his time on jackson's island and working his way down river, huck revels in and enjoys his ad hoc dining. in the first chapter, we observe huck is ironically trapped in a "civilized" world, when he would prefer to live freely in nature.

the sentence that avoid faulty coordination is:

culture, which is well represented in philadelphia, plays a major role including theatre, music, and the visual arts.  

faulty coordination occurs when the writer gives equal importance two different ideas (clauses) which in fact are not equivalent. in order to correct a misplaced clause or idea, the writer can place less important or emphatic ideas in a relative clause as in the previous sentence.